Buongiorno Antonio,

Let us understand this issue with great clarity in the simplest terms in any language.

A sensitive receives signals from a wide variety of locations, however, in taking that information and making a prediction from it requires skill. While your body says an earthquake or volcanic event is on the horizon, you need to place that information into a unit of understanding that has the ability to stand the test of a useable prediction.

Thus if your elbow hurts severely and you know from past experience, everytime your elbow hurts severely theres an earthquake in Istambul, then you can write a prediction that says the following.

00/00/00
5.0 - 5.5
Istambul (Latitude & Longitude)
95%
Because my elbow hurts severely.

Thus the percentage of chance and the formulation of a prediction are gathered and if it falls in the 50% range, its nearly useless and if a prediction does not come in 100% of the time, then it to is useless. So you must be able to discern which are worthwhile predictions and only post those and leave the rest until you have more surity in what you think you know.

A is the bodily signal
B is knowing from whence it comes
C is formulating a valid prediction from the information gathered.

I hear ear tones all the time, but I haven't even discovered the range of my ability to hear these sounds, so if I make a prediction on them and it doesn't arrive, it doesn't mean an event didn't happen, it just means I don't know how to assess the information I'm receiving, but the prediction remains invalid.

I hope this helps to clarify that which I have tried to explain previously. Maybe it is a language thing or how one views making predictions and the assumptions of information gathered versus the delivery of such. As you know, its quite difficult, but with time, not knowing, is replaced by knowing and in that, then and only then can one make valid predictions.

I hope this is helpful.

Pat