|
Oh boy. Another hint of tension. |
Chris, I must say that this time it is Petra that justifiably missed a point. And as an "outsider" I missed the point too. Chris, if you were trying to say something about X-rays (versus others radiation, including ULF) it was as unclear as it can get. Your cat-scan did not give you ear-tones. Big deal. I get ear-tones and have had a tone-less cat scan too. As have thousands of others. So? You mentioned in previous posts that you also hear ear-tones, but you did not bother to mention that here. Because I remembered that, I assumed you were not being condescending. But it looked that way anyway. Posting is dangerous, Chris. Do not do it on your breaks from writing "serious"papers. Stay just as serious here too. Never mind.
Follow Ups: ● lets just OVER ANALYZE - Todd 11:03:20 - 11/2/2005 (29980) (2) ● Proof that posting is dangerous. - Ara 20:46:58 - 11/2/2005 (29998) (2) ● Re: Proof that posting is dangerous. - Todd 22:43:42 - 11/2/2005 (30002) (1) ● Note for Todd: let freedom ring - Ara 04:11:18 - 11/3/2005 (30011) (1) ● Re: Note for Todd: let freedom ring - Todd 15:06:40 - 11/3/2005 (30023) (0) ● Research needs researchers - Petra 21:29:53 - 11/2/2005 (30000) (1) ● Ear Tones -- field of choice for researchers - Ara 04:32:33 - 11/3/2005 (30012) (0) ● Re: lets just OVER ANALYZE - chris in suburbia 14:07:34 - 11/2/2005 (29994) (1) ● Smiles - Petra 19:25:35 - 11/2/2005 (29996) (1) ● EEG - chris in suburbia 03:26:17 - 11/3/2005 (30010) (0) |
|