|
Shan, to clarify my position |
Shan, re your discussion below with Ara: I don't support your method because I don't fully understand it and because the part I do understand makes no sense. But that doesn't matter. Success or failure is what counts. What I can do is plot your predictions on a map and then plot ensuing quakes to show how they do or do not fit. The map will keep score so at the end we will know how many hits and misses we have. That's only a rough estimate because what is needed is the probability of success and it's different for each prediction in your case. Roger Follow Ups: ● And to clarify mine - Ara 07:48:44 - 10/19/2005 (29516) (1) ● Re: And to clarify mine PS about Japan prediction - Ara 08:04:55 - 10/19/2005 (29522) (1) ● Note to Board Members - R.Shanmugasundaram 10:30:42 - 10/19/2005 (29523) (2) ● Re: Note to Board Members - chris in suburbia 07:27:24 - 10/20/2005 (29561) (1) ● Request to Roger - R.Shanmugasundaram 17:15:31 - 10/20/2005 (29619) (1) ● Re: Request to Roger - Roger Hunter 18:44:03 - 10/20/2005 (29622) (1) ● Re: Request to Roger - R.Shanmugasundaram 21:51:47 - 10/20/2005 (29624) (1) ● Re: Request to Roger - Roger Hunter 22:45:27 - 10/20/2005 (29626) (2) ● Yup, I confused them - chris in suburbia 08:37:24 - 10/22/2005 (29681) (0) ● Thank you.. - R.Shanmugasundaram 00:49:32 - 10/21/2005 (29627) (1) ● Re: Thank you too, Shan - Ara 04:12:48 - 10/21/2005 (29628) (1) ● Now Ara, - Roger Hunter 07:49:59 - 10/21/2005 (29630) (0) ● Another Week to Watch! - glen 22:37:49 - 10/19/2005 (29556) (1) ● Re: Another Week to Watch! - R.Shanmugasundaram 21:57:53 - 10/20/2005 (29625) (0) |
|