|
Re: do not understand Shan's method |
Chris (& Shan), "I'd have to re-read Shan's recent posts on his method to see how much of it makes sense to me....right now, I don't understand the sentence you repost." Well, I excerpted that from Shan's post directly above (top of this thread). Shouldn't be too exhausting to check out the context without me quoting the whole post. Let us know if you figure out what Shan is talking about. It is too vague for me, and I think the problem is not about English usage, but rather his own reluctance to spell out clearly what he is doing. To Shan, I would say: better to keep your method totally secret, than to make vague ambiguous incomplete statements. You do not gain credibility that way, you lose it. Follow Ups: ● Re: do not understand Shan's method - R.Shanmugasundaram 08:02:36 - 10/16/2005 (29404) (1) ● Shan & Ara: simultaneous posting - Ara 08:18:42 - 10/16/2005 (29408) (0) ● Re: do not understand Shan's method - chris in suburbia 05:15:20 - 10/16/2005 (29403) (1) ● Comments on comments: skeptical of Shan - Ara 08:04:06 - 10/16/2005 (29407) (2) ● Re: Comments on comments: skeptical of Shan - R.Shanmugasundaram 23:20:02 - 10/16/2005 (29429) (0) ● Shan's method - Roger Hunter 08:58:10 - 10/16/2005 (29409) (1) ● Evaluation versus Visual Presentation - Ara 21:42:05 - 10/17/2005 (29434) (1) ● Re: Evaluation versus Visual Presentation - Roger Hunter 07:43:43 - 10/18/2005 (29447) (1) ● Re: Evaluation versus Visual Presentation - Ara 11:00:30 - 10/18/2005 (29453) (2) ● will you please....... - R.Shanmugasundaram 23:31:49 - 10/18/2005 (29506) (1) ● Re: will you please....... - Ara 04:04:21 - 10/19/2005 (29509) (1) ● Re: will you please....... - R.Shanmugasundaram 05:03:46 - 10/19/2005 (29514) (0) ● Re: Evaluation versus Visual Presentation - Roger Hunter 11:55:28 - 10/18/2005 (29485) (0) |
|