Thank You Antonio for the greetings.

In seeking the answer as to why there are two divisions of thought here, I think we need to remember, what we are working to achieve, is a yet untested theory. Its only a hypothesis. We believe from our experiences, earthquakes or volcanic events will follow those symptoms. The problem is, that they don't always. To have a valid prediction method it has to be repeatable, every single time.

So when we think of the scientific community as not giving us credence for this area, we have to understand that they surely would if we could prove the theory or hypotheses does work, repeatedly. The only way this can be done is through further research, development of the theory on the whole and translating that into an instrument which will record the sounds earthquake faults deliver, which will coinside with the symptoms people are having.

So how do we get there? We aren't in the scientific community, so we aren't allowed access to the funding for scientific projects that they have. Without funding, we aren't likely to get to far unless we can find a benefactor who wishes to fund this research. I already asked Bill Gates and he said no, but that was for a scientific prediction project, not this one. He's not interested in predicting earthquakes.

So I will put it this way, perhaps instead of finding more sensitives to continue a global search, perhaps we should start looking for some funding and use the people who have been at this for a long, long time. People like you Antonio. I'm a newcomer. I've only had two years into this project. But I'm the only one so far who seems to see it as a research project.

I want to see these symptoms formalized, categorized and I want to find out exactly how its possible to record the sounds faults make. As to why this couldn't be done from a scientific project, I am unsure. Perhaps it can be, but it requires someone who has an interest to see if the hypotheses can become a proven theory. So where is he or she? Got me, haven't found them yet. Still looking.

But I'm not giving up. Columbus wanted to prove the world was round. I'm not really sure he did, but he didn't fall off the edge either. Newton has his theory of relativity. Pangea was hardly accepted until recently. Today computers are a household item that is used more than TV. It is a way to communicate globally and has more information most likely than any library in the world. Its a considerable learning tool. So in time will my Seismic Sound Theory hold up on its own, I don't know, but I'm sure going to work hard to find out. But any offers of assistance by either funding or scientific assistance will be most appreciated.

Pat