|
Re: Disaster Scenario - News - Rodgers Creek Fault |
Canie...while the quake you speak of may be somewhat more common that what I say below, it would also be much less damaging. the real dangerous fault is the Compton and its offshore continuation that I have been mapping....the offshore SW limb of Palos Verdes anticlinorium is continuous for 50 km so the faults underneath are likely a continuous system. Combining the offshore fault areas with the area of the Compton ramp doubles the area and makes the Shaw and Suppe (1996) M 7.0 a M7.3 instead. This would be a thrust or oblique thrust earthquake where Long Beach and much of Los Angeles would be above the fault. Ground motions in thrust earthquakes are higher (generally) than in strike-slip earthquakes. Given the deep sedimentary Los Angeles basin, this would not be at all a good scenario.. I need to write up and publish this paper because the student who was supposed to do this is not...but I have papers backed up....and they take me a long time. Follow Ups: ● Chris.... - Petra 07:04:41 - 9/7/2005 (28018) (1) ● how long is long..both - chris in suburbia 11:52:22 - 9/7/2005 (28021) (1) ● Re: how long is long..both - Roger Hunter 12:16:30 - 9/7/2005 (28023) (1) ● Re: how long is long..both - Ummm??? - Petra 18:00:00 - 9/7/2005 (28043) (1) ● Re: how long is long..both - Ummm??? - Roger Hunter 18:22:45 - 9/7/2005 (28044) (2) ● Ok, So What's The Attraction? - Petra 19:52:04 - 9/7/2005 (28047) (1) ● brainstorming - chris in suburbia 03:42:30 - 9/8/2005 (28053) (1) ● Re: brainstorming - Canie 09:01:29 - 9/8/2005 (28061) (1) ● Don't you mean synergy? n/t - Roger Hunter 18:52:14 - 9/8/2005 (28088) (1) ● Re: Don't you mean synergy? n/t - Canie 07:59:56 - 9/9/2005 (28098) (0) ● that's "bureaucratic" - Roger Hunter 18:27:16 - 9/7/2005 (28045) (2) ● Re: that's "bureaucratic" - Canie 08:58:54 - 9/8/2005 (28060) (0) ● Re: that's "bureaucratic" - Don in Hollister 01:25:36 - 9/8/2005 (28052) (0) |
|