Ara,

You said that "...The largest of these, a 7.2M, did NOT occur in your time frame -- only a
6.2M did."

I never said that a 7.2M was going to occur. Please refer once more my prediction report. I said
" 6 to 7+M quake over.." means the magnitude felt between 6M to 7+ i.e. around 7.1 or 7.2M.

>Moreover, the distance is over 3x your own limitation of 250km ----
I already agreed change in the location.

Your next claim was.. "Why are you correlating a quake that happened so far away, and that is
not the largest of a series? Why was there no prediction concerning the 7.2M?"

Very simple answer. I can predict whatever the magnitude of the quake is but sun shine is
very essential for the same. During the course of 7.2M at your place, there was no sunshine over
my end. If you refer my website, everyday I always indicate about the sunshine over my area.

I would like to add information, though I am spending my spare time to this research
constantly, my attention is diverted towards attending important functions, medical traffic,
and other family affairs etc. But these are overcome by way of team work when
entrusted to Govt. / Institutions. Hope the day will come soon.

>If your time frame is not finished, why are you already announcing a correlation with the
Aug 30th quake? What makes you so sure it is the one correlating with your observation?
Perhaps there will be one at your predicted location in the next couple of days.

A very good question. I come across such instance in the past. The result much satisfy my
expectation compared to what I have calculated from the precursor which I received. Some
times more than a quake with little less magnitude arise. On other hand a series of quakes
- call it as swam - happened with the expected strong magnitude or little less. If you
refer my recent predictions over Sumatra is such type.

Sorry.. at the moment I am unable to disclose all the details. But certain extant I am
able to clear your doubts.

A simple question if you are interested in this method i.e. what makes the difference
in shadow movement of an object while sun shines when earth moving around the sun regularly.

Now, I understand why the 800 KM variance comes into act.
See normally I need 3 days of consecutive sunshine days to fix a quake movement. In this
particular case I have received only two days consecutive sunshine days. Hence I have
fulfill only 2 parameters i.e. magnitude and time frame. Anyway I satisfied with this
result since which add more experience to me.

I totally agreed with you without knowing the method and difficulties (one of the reason
which I stated as above) making comments on one prediction and criticizing is baseless.
Rather than look into other predictions (for example Andaman Island I gave simultaneously
which receives no comment from your end too) is meaningless.

Thanks for the opportunity to write and made many threat on the Board. If any Govt,or
other institutions come forward to promote this method it is well and good. But after
the devastation just spending huge money and condolence got no meaning in my dictionary.

Thank you.

Shan