Re: 5.6 down south!
Posted by glen on June 12, 2005 at 14:54:22:

This is not normal for such a small quake. A 5.6 usually does not have anywhere near this many after shocks. Really, this quake was just a baby compared to Northridge. I do remember all those aftershocks then. I am beginning to think something bigger might be coming. It did take 4 days for the largest after shock to occur after the 1968 Borrego Mountain quake. That quake was a 6.5, and was much strong than this Anza quake.

glen


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: 5.6 down south! - SCSN Report - Canie  15:49:28 - 6/12/2005  (26366)  (1)
        ● Re: 5.6 down south! - SCSN Report - glen  16:46:52 - 6/12/2005  (26367)  (2)
           ● Re: 5.6 down south! - SCSN Report - Mary Antonelli  22:14:57 - 6/12/2005  (26370)  (1)
              ● Re: 5.6 down south! - SCSN Report - Canie  22:57:10 - 6/12/2005  (26371)  (0)
           ● tiny aftershocks - chris in suburbia  18:13:05 - 6/12/2005  (26368)  (3)
              ● my mistake...lots of 2s - chris in suburbia  09:11:52 - 6/13/2005  (26377)  (0)
              ● Re: tiny aftershocks - Cathryn  01:00:29 - 6/13/2005  (26372)  (1)
                 ● Re: tiny aftershocks - Cathryn  01:08:40 - 6/13/2005  (26373)  (0)
              ● Laguna Salada - glen  19:29:34 - 6/12/2005  (26369)  (0)