Thank you for all
Posted by R.Shanmugasundaram on March 29, 2005 at 16:40:43:

Thank you, Petra, Chris, John, Cathryn, Michael and every one who are watching this fruitful discussion and it's boost me in my work. I learn lot of things after entering into this board by the help of EQF in couple of years back. Everyday sunshine is speaking to me to download the future story, if you want.

At this moment I would like to share my daily activities. Actually, I getup around 4 or 5 O'clock. After browsing my computer, and finish my walk around 7 AM. Then I am running pillar to post by way of taking sun shadow reading along with helping my daughters to go to school and my wife, she is working as teacher in Govt. School and put them to the nearby bus stop using my moped. Some of the important sun shadow reading lying in between, I am much nervous during that moment. Subsequently along with taking readings and I prepare to rush to my office in the right time. Being a Private Sector Bank I reached my home in the late evening and after taking snacks immediately switched to analyze the morning readings, watching TV for clippings related to our subject, share my views through my HAM friends using VHF freq. and before go to bed, I uploaded my predictions. In between I have to fulfill my family needs. Why I describing all the above is the reason for my delay in posting.

Coming to the subject, I have noticed great disturbance in sun shadow readings subsequent to last full moon days. Readings were jumped. Usually this is the nature when a big one on the way. Hence I posted in my website about the same in head line accordingly. When Japan was experienced last quarter of 2003 if I remember correct, the same thing was happened. So the recent Sumatra quake is a complex result of stress accumulation by more than one fault and released by slippage of moon gravitation line with the alignment of sun and the earth. But Dec. 26 precursor is sudden development and it gave a clear stress accumulation pattern not like the present one complex nature.
When I was posted in the board and subsequently send the message by e-mail, one of the Seismologist who is very friend of mine informed that "Theoretically it is difficult that geo-stress of comparable dimensions will be generated within three months of the previous quake at a nearby location.I find ,your observation needs to be re-examined. If at all an earthquake occurs at the location suggested by you it could be of the order of 7.0 (+ or - 0.5). It is totally impossible that an event comparable to 26th Dec 2004 will occur within Sumatra in next few days. I would like to give a word of caution. If this observation is made public it may create fear psychosis and apprehension amongst the already affected population of South Asia. It is necessary to exercise some restrain". But I replied him that I posted on whatever received through sun shadow as precursor. The next day i.e. on 22nd March I have noticed some change in magnitude and that also I conveyed to this board and as well as in my sites. I think the high seismic activity due to full moon alignment period was the reason for the increased magnitude of the quake.

I would like to touch the distance between my predicted and actual epi center which was critized a lot. I like to mention the following for your information:


2005/03/28 16:09:36 2.07N 97.01E 30.0 8.7 NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA (USGS)

28/03/2005 21:39:58.00(IST) 8.2 Lat 5.9degN,Long 97.9degE NORTHERN SUMATRA(IMD)

Please watch the epi center of the quake in both cases. As a layman depends on greater institution for results, I like to know where I am to stick on. Please suggest.

Experts warned that third big one on the way within couple of months. I hope I may post the same if sun shines and pray God though it will happen nothing to happen to human life.

Once again thank you all for the encouragement and will be share more in the future. Please excuse for my poor English.

Thank you,

Shan


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Thank you for all - Michael Tolchard  11:30:22 - 3/30/2005  (25459)  (0)
     ● You're Welcome Shan - Petra  18:06:55 - 3/29/2005  (25434)  (1)
        ● Re: You're Welcome Shan - Cathryn  19:41:45 - 3/29/2005  (25442)  (0)