ULF PS... P.S.
Posted by Ara on January 17, 2005 at 19:44:42:

I forgot to mention that Fraser-Smith was on the international committee that favorably evaluated the Japanese ULF-precursor project, and strongly urged that the government continue funding it. The government ignored this recommendation.

Also, please note my {Four Problems} post on the {Take A Note} thread below, which is a brief statement on problems with a ULF-based conceptual framework for ear tones. I want to emphasize that Petra&Donfs method of calculation for distance from ear-tone location to earthquake location is solely based on their observations of earthquakes that occurred subsequent to various ear tones heard. No explanation is offered as to why each second of tone indicates 37.5 miles of distance.

Their g37.5 miles per secondh is NOT a gsub-lightspeed velocityh as John apparently called it in his {right way to start narrowing the options} post; it is simply an empirically derived method of calculation.

Ara