|
Re: Acoustic buzz(Acouphen) as earthquake's precursor |
How I wrote you yesterday, the information, about "Acoustic buzz", will not be, in this case, a prediction. If you interpret my italian-english better, you'll see it is a question of a decided seismic precursor. This precursor (this only!), that I mean with letter "C", on later you'll find again in my predictions, but I'll use in more considerable case only. In last days I sent my predictions to the january/20/00 and for it has been some starting confusion, in part due to my little experience of internet (I navigate scarcely a month) and also to my poor knowledge of english, I haven't well understand if they have been in "case sensitive" or in this new board pubblished (please help me to know it). However, it will be my menagement to sent they every time I'll enough important phenomena foresee and more over I'll do a compiting month after month. If you want it interpret, immagine a machine, sited in Naples, that this signals (my precursors) writes compare this signals with all of seismic, after a share of time, in the world happen and, with reference to the kilometric distance (as a normal seismograph), you'll realize, that this machine (myself) translate in letters and simbolies the language seismic of the earth. To the our future collaboration. Follow Ups: ● Re: Thanks but more questions - Canie 19:50:33 - 1/22/2000 (2376) (2) ● Re: Thanks but more questions - Antonio Romino 12:44:53 - 1/24/2000 (2396) (0) ● Re: Thanks but more questions-Canie - Pat In Petaluma 23:37:51 - 1/22/2000 (2377) (0) |
|