Shan, I went back to your post 23349, and it did not say there would be a quake on the 23rd...it said, and I quote "expected before 23rd October". It was not before Oct 23, it was on Oct 23. And, it was implied that the quake should have been between Oct 12 or 13, when the precursor was seen, and the 23rd. You posted on the 18th. On your blogspot link the claim is for a M>5 quake for 2 weeks after the post date: not for Oct 23 only. How can I be sure that this was really posted before the quake, if I do not watch this page? It says 4:14 AM, but I don't know what time zone...but does say friday Oct 22 2004 at the top. Explain why this is showing an earthquake cloud. I see the linear cloud, but was there a weather front along it at the time? So, I think this report you posted is interesting and I would like to know more about it, but be very careful not to exaggerate claims of success or red flags go up for many scientists...like me.
Chris