Re: Reply with more result
Posted by R.Shanmugasundaram on September 25, 2004 at 08:16:29:


Roger,

Sorry for my delayed post due to tight schedule.

The appended one is the style of this board for posting prediction:

Magnitude:
From: - To:
Location: Northern California
Circular or Rectangular reference in lat-lon.
Range

In my websites, I am posting as :

Magnitude: Around .. to ..M (always +/- 1M) (@)
From - To: 48 to 180 hours From 10 AM IST on......
Location: (always given in lat-lon.
Range given as always +/- 3 degrees i.e. in circular reference.(@)
@: These are given as common at the bottom of my web sites separately.

Since I am posting a number of locations daily, giving them separately is taking
much time to post and that will occupy more space in the websites. Hence I covered
them under one roof as above. In my mind if I given a particular Magnitude it covers
both sides i.e. if I given a magnitude as 4M it may vary from 3 to 5M. These are all
obtained based on my practical experience. Credit and misses ratio will be reduced
in due course. Hope you understand and welcome your comment.

As informed Hokkaido again jolted by fresh quake as given below:
2004/09/24 18:57:37.3 41.6N 142.9E 33 Ms4.0 M GSRC HOKKAIDO, JAPAN, REGION
No prediction over Hokkaido due to heavy down pour at my end and with little sunshine
I expect around 5M quake over AFGHANISTAN-TAJIKISTAN (36.6N 71.4E) from 10 AM IST (+5.30
UTC) from 10 AM on 25th Sept. 04.

I am curiously watching the recent posting of TIM about CA 6.3M on 28th Sept.

Shan