|
Re: Response to EQF |
Finally, a cogent response. My, my. Don't blame me for your horrid track record, or for not getting this top scientist not joining this board. I hardly said "Boo" to you for four years. You claim you never insult anybody. I have been insulted by you. Furthermore, you insult everyone on this board with your incessant nonsense and incomprehensible website (incomprehensible even to the experts). Canie, the natives are getting restless, and it's not just me. You should hear what gets sent off list about EQF. You would have a real eye opener. You are doing yourself a huge disservice by allowing him to post here. It impairs your credibility. And I say this with all kindness. You are losing face in the earthquake prediction field for providing a forum for his ideas. If we all have to register to join this site, what on earth is the purpose when you have a) an alias Canie, I respect and like you immensely, but enough is enough. Please! Cathryn, and others who have had it with this clown. (And who has a few credentials of her own, but I don't boast about them at every opportunity.) Cathryn Follow Ups: ● Note to Canie and Cathryn - EQF 02:11:55 - 8/14/2004 (22486) (1) ● Re: Note to Canie and Cathryn - Cathryn 02:55:05 - 8/14/2004 (22489) (0) |
|