|
re: Canie |
Canie; EQF doesn't bother me and there's no reason to bar him that I can see. I don't necessarily agree with him but that's no reason to censor him. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: re: Canie - Cathryn 17:38:46 - 8/13/2004 (22472) (1) ● re: Canie - Roger Hunter 18:23:15 - 8/13/2004 (22475) (2) ● Re: re: Canie - EQF 22:16:48 - 8/13/2004 (22481) (0) ● Re: re: Canie - Cathryn 18:56:38 - 8/13/2004 (22478) (0) |
|