Re: EQF's prediction program
Posted by Petra on August 05, 2004 at 21:04:04:

Excuse me EQF, but you're being rude, again. Roger Hunter is a credentialed scientist and you are not and its about time you paid some respect to those in that field and stop screaming out from your Ivory Tower that you know it all.

Things that are tricky to find, mean they are like smoke and mirrors, which is more of your diatribe that I take great umbridge to almost every time you post.

There are no great discoveries. If there were, they would be papered and others would have acknowledged them. So far, no word outside of your own ought to prove that point.

And lastly and as always, I wish you would stop using that term "warning type signal" for ear tones. Ear tones are ear tones and earthquakes sometimes happen after being heard, but its a sound, not a warning signal. Ear tone experiencers can hear from 1.0 mags on up, so you can't count a one as being a warning signal. That would be a little silly, don't you think? I do. I've never known you to ever assign a magnitude to a ear tone. You usually say a large or major quake, but nothing else. And of course, if its not there, we should look elsewhere is how you put anyway. Also if your warning type signal is not an ear tone would you please be specific in explaining what they are, so that we all may be able to understand what you're referring to.

Please do not respond in telling me you do not have the time. You have plenty of time and we all appreciate that when you post as you frequently post only to yourself as many as four or more times when no one replies.

If you feel that you have all of your ducks in a row and even scientists can not understand what you are saying perhaps you should write a book called "Earth Sciences for Dummies" and see if anyone will publish it.

Please refrain from using condecending language to our noted scientists who post here. I appreciate their being here and I do not wish to see them offended while in our company.

Thank you....Petra


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: EQF's prediction program - EQF  04:11:07 - 8/7/2004  (22338)  (0)