Hello Candlestick,

I wish to say thank you very much for your earthquake prediction methods. I believe you meant to say Fortuna, CA, rather than Fontana.

There are thousands of ways to forecast future earthquakes and for each forecaster I am certain the deliverance of that forecast is serious. I would like to try to be of benefit to you, by suggesting your use of the internet to obtain information of the physical parameters that are being measured everyday. The internet is a vast storehouse of scientific material, meters of every type imaginable. With what you have, you may want to make use of that data that is easily accessible to you. Look and see if it helps you put a little bit more definition, from the physical measurable parameters and see where that leads you.

I like to ask when looking at the readings, does it fortify the prediction or not. Have I seen something change that was not previously there. What was visable just before that last earthquake or series of quakes. Is there a pattern that repeats itself every time? If you will print the data and keep track, over time you'll see how it was and then be able to compare it with the present.

So again, thank you. It will be interesting in the days ahead to see how the predictions fare out.

Pat