Hi Don, Roger and Chris,

I express my inability to spare time to answer your postings immediately, due to official
as well as my personal works. It's also reflected in my recent prediction work too. Please
bear with me. Now, come to the point.

Don... what you said about existing calibration technology, which is derived from close
observation of many instances by experts. But what I am giving is also with different observation
technic, which is also derived from the Mother Nature. Though this technic is not yet refined,
but yield good results based on my experience. If the method is fine-tuned from different
locations like the present setup doing by the experts, I can say you may easily obtained all
the parameters what you have required from me now. In other words, it is in the crystal radio
stage so its need proper improvement to reach the present IC stage. So please come out from
the creepy town.-:)

Roger.. Yes the original magnitude was weakened due to emerging into two quakes. As I said
like the same situation I have faced a few times in the past also. If you are very particular
I have to dig into my old files and find out the same for you. But it will take some time.

But I don't know how Chris is much stick on the probability calculation of previous quakes.
My opinion it will not coincide with 100% results. Since our earthmovement on the space is
changing year by year in a different "track" with respect to sun so that your probability
calculations may be right for the next year if the earth is in the same 'track' as well as
aligning of all other planets on the same place and moving on the same direction, maintaining
the same distance and resonance. Is it possible?

Roger.. For your information.. if you go through my prediction report it is always cover
from 4M and above predictions only. Though I have come across smaller ones, mostly I neglected
to post except it is going to occur nearby my area.

Today I am expecting a good quake over N-India and Philippines...I will calculate and post it
later.

Shan