too vague
Posted by chris in suburbia on January 04, 2004 at 03:56:16:

John, I know you have to be careful about passing along someone's unpublished ideas, but this would be interesting-so if you can be more specific, please do. Actually, the other time I entered one of Petra's contests, I chose Bombay Beach, but I was wrong. I'm aware that: it has been maybe 300 years since the last southernmost San Andreas quake; there is a left-lateral fault off of Bombay Beach that lit up a couple of time, including M4+, in the last year or 2; that Elmore Range left lateral M6.2 preceded the Superstition Hills M6.6 by 1/2 day. A couple of Lamont people and I proposed 4 times to NSF to acquire marine seismic reflection data from a barge (constructed from pieces) in Salton Sea, and the left-lateral faults were part of this (as well as an interesting rotation model that Nano did not publish-shown at AGU in, I think, 1998). After 4 rejections, we gave up....
Chris


Follow Ups:
     ● work of others - John Vidale  11:57:12 - 1/4/2004  (20883)  (2)
        ● Re: work of others - Canie  17:24:35 - 1/4/2004  (20901)  (1)
           ● Good idea - Roger Hunter  17:49:35 - 1/4/2004  (20907)  (1)
              ● another abstract (IUGG 2003) - John Vidale  18:08:59 - 1/4/2004  (20910)  (1)
                 ● Re: geogeaphical coordinates? - steve s/ sf  00:34:30 - 1/5/2004  (20922)  (1)
                    ● complicated - John Vidale  16:49:06 - 1/5/2004  (20939)  (0)
        ● accelerating moment release - chris in suburbia  14:53:03 - 1/4/2004  (20889)  (0)