Roger,

As informed by me, the 5th location also jolted close to my predicted location, i.e.

Predited Location: NORTHERN MOLUCCA SEA (1.6N 125.9E)
EMSC reported as :
2003/12/28 05:36:53.2 0.6N 122.3E 70 mb5.6 M GSRC MINAHASSA PENINSULA, SULAWESI

Since it was in our discussion session just I mentioned the place as Iran and the location
was clearly mentioned in my web site as " SOUTHEASTERN IRAN (29.00N 58.33E)" with expected
time window with appropriate magnitude.

>When you give multiple locations, each one counts as a separate prediction.

Yes I agree and I request you to refer Evaluation Report in my website
(http://shanquakeforecate.com) on Sun Shadow method (Part-2) written by Mr. Chen I-wan,
Advisor Committee of Natural Hazards Prediction of the China Geophysics Society about
" Notes on adopting the ratings of Practical Value and Scientific Value ".

>Small quakes are of little interest as are aftershocks which are inevitable (frequently, not always).

But such a 6.6M Southeastern Iran quake only had a very few i.e. one 5.4 (NEIC) and one
4M (Red Puma) aftershock on 26 and 28th Dec.03 respectively and it clearly shows stress release
was not properly settled down so far. At the same time today's earthmovement warned that further
strong quake cornered over the same place within 3 days as mentioned in my last report.

Please note that one cook may not serve good food to vast people having different taste.
I have shown how to prepare food.. it is the duty and responsibility of others to arrange
to make and serve the food to all people depending upon their needs and diseases.!

Shan