|
Re: Earthquakes And Nuclear Testing |
Hi EQF. The energy released by nuclear explosion is nothing compared to one major earthquake. There is nothing there to indicate that all of the nuclear explosions combined had any affect on any of the faults world-wide. I used a new calculation that one nuclear explosion is equal to an M>5.0 quake to see how many it would take to equal one M>8.0 quake. The new calculation is that it would take 1,185,921 detonating at the same time. The 2,036 nuclear explosions don’t even remotely come close to equaling one M>8.0 quake. From my point of view I really and truly don’t see anything there that nuclear explosion upset the occurrences of major quakes. There are most likely other reasons that for right now remain unknown to us. The following is the ANSS quake catalog. As you can see it is different then the NEIC catalog. A 30-year database is extremely small. If you had a 30,000-year database you might be able to make something of it. Take Care…Don in creepy town 1899/09/04 00:22:00.00 60.0000 -142.0000 25.00 8.30 ML 0 AK Follow Ups: ● energy in earthquakes vs explosions - John Vidale 07:07:32 - 11/26/2003 (20283) (1) ● Re: energy in earthquakes vs explosions - Don in Hollister 11:45:41 - 11/26/2003 (20284) (0) ● Re: Earthquakes And Nuclear Testing - EQF 21:04:48 - 11/25/2003 (20279) (1) ● Re: Earthquakes And Nuclear Testing - Don in Hollister 21:40:58 - 11/25/2003 (20280) (1) ● where did 1,185,921 come from? - chris in suburbia 13:34:10 - 11/26/2003 (20285) (1) ● Re: where did 1,185,921 come from? - Don in Hollister 14:52:14 - 11/26/2003 (20286) (0) |
|