|
Beating dead horses |
Its a wonder I'm not so interested or can't find time in my busy schedule to keep up with the posts here... It seems to have become a Don & Petra versus EQF board... I'm tired of it. Please drop the subject, everyone knows how everyone else feels. The archives are probably better that 50% posts with some relationship to the subject. Someday maybe EQF will make public predictions, maybe he won't... Anything Don & Petra say will not make one bit of difference as to whether EQF continues or not - Or better yet, Don & Petra, why don't you write up a nice long page on your web site saying all that you have to say about EQF and just use it in your signature line? Then its all said once and I don't have to continually read it and you don't have to keep tyoing it... or do you just copy and paste? I'd really like this to be an educational site about earthquake prediction and a place for people to have constructive conversations, not destructive ones.... And a place to post predictions so there can be some historical accuracy in the data. Canie Follow Ups: ● Re: Beating dead horses - Cathryn 03:51:41 - 11/19/2003 (20136) (1) ● Re: Beating dead horses - EQF 16:36:21 - 11/19/2003 (20143) (1) ● fixated by the 1% - John Vidale 16:43:39 - 11/19/2003 (20144) (1) ● Dealing with the reality of the situation - EQF 17:10:33 - 11/19/2003 (20145) (0) ● Re: Beating dead horses - chris in suburbia 09:20:16 - 11/13/2003 (20101) (2) ● agree, and vice versa - John Vidale 11:36:45 - 11/13/2003 (20107) (1) ● Re: agree, and vice versa - Todd 12:05:46 - 11/13/2003 (20108) (0) ● Re: Beating dead horses - EQF 11:33:06 - 11/13/2003 (20106) (0) |
|