|
Re: Wrong Methodology |
Petra, as I have said in the past, if you want to keep whatever you are doing a secret then that is your business. What I have been saying and will say again here is that I would simply like to be able discuss the technology which I am using to evaluate Ear Tone signals etc. without having arguments get started. What I am doing appears to be dramatically different than the methodology you have developed. I am happy with it. And among some international forecasting personnel it is rather highly regarded. Follow Ups: ● Re: Wrong Methodology - Petra Challus 18:42:59 - 10/16/2003 (19716) (1) ● Re: Wrong Methodology - EQF 20:18:49 - 10/16/2003 (19719) (1) ● Re: Wrong Methodology - Petra Challus 21:09:07 - 10/16/2003 (19721) (1) ● Re: Wrong Methodology - Canie 07:48:46 - 10/17/2003 (19733) (1) ● Excessive arguments - EQF 13:53:54 - 10/17/2003 (19738) (2) ● Re: Excessive arguments - Cathryn 20:34:58 - 10/18/2003 (19782) (1) ● Re: EFU - Petra 23:36:53 - 10/18/2003 (19783) (2) ● Re: EFU - Kate 13:20:05 - 10/20/2003 (19790) (0) ● Re: EFU - Cathryn 16:00:43 - 10/19/2003 (19789) (0) ● Yada, Yada, Yada...Have it, it yours - Petra Challus 14:14:56 - 10/17/2003 (19741) (1) ● Earthquake housing project - EQF 15:35:33 - 10/17/2003 (19746) (1) ● Re: Earthquake housing project - Petra Challus 19:21:49 - 10/17/2003 (19750) (0) |
|