Re: Wrong Methodology
Posted by EQF on October 16, 2003 at 18:10:38:

Petra, as I have said in the past, if you want to keep whatever you are doing a secret then that is your business. What I have been saying and will say again here is that I would simply like to be able discuss the technology which I am using to evaluate Ear Tone signals etc. without having arguments get started.

What I am doing appears to be dramatically different than the methodology you have developed. I am happy with it. And among some international forecasting personnel it is rather highly regarded.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Wrong Methodology - Petra Challus  18:42:59 - 10/16/2003  (19716)  (1)
        ● Re: Wrong Methodology - EQF  20:18:49 - 10/16/2003  (19719)  (1)
           ● Re: Wrong Methodology - Petra Challus  21:09:07 - 10/16/2003  (19721)  (1)
              ● Re: Wrong Methodology - Canie  07:48:46 - 10/17/2003  (19733)  (1)
                 ● Excessive arguments - EQF  13:53:54 - 10/17/2003  (19738)  (2)
                    ● Re: Excessive arguments - Cathryn  20:34:58 - 10/18/2003  (19782)  (1)
                       ● Re: EFU - Petra  23:36:53 - 10/18/2003  (19783)  (2)
                          ● Re: EFU - Kate  13:20:05 - 10/20/2003  (19790)  (0)
                          ● Re: EFU - Cathryn  16:00:43 - 10/19/2003  (19789)  (0)
                    ● Yada, Yada, Yada...Have it, it yours - Petra Challus  14:14:56 - 10/17/2003  (19741)  (1)
                       ● Earthquake housing project - EQF  15:35:33 - 10/17/2003  (19746)  (1)
                          ● Re: Earthquake housing project - Petra Challus  19:21:49 - 10/17/2003  (19750)  (0)