|
skepticism would be appropriate |
The most likely explanation for the trend is that there are several centers of seismic activity, like Tonga or a major aftershock zone, that have these apparently special distances as their separation. To discard this possibility, one should compare time-scrambled catalogues with the real catalog, or examine which event-pairs are occurring for the special distances. I'm particularly skeptical because these distances do not correspond to much, if any, amplification of the seismic waves. I don't have time to pursue this myself. John Follow Ups: ● Re: skepticism would be appropriate - chris in suburbia 06:33:16 - 10/11/2003 (19645) (2) ● CORRECTION - chris in suburbia 05:07:02 - 10/14/2003 (19675) (0) ● Chris; new file on its' way - Roger Hunter 19:02:03 - 10/11/2003 (19646) (1) ● following on John's caution - chris in suburbia 07:58:26 - 10/12/2003 (19648) (1) ● needs to be done by computer - chris in suburbia 08:09:20 - 10/12/2003 (19649) (0) |
|