|
rings, gravity, etc. |
Cathryn, I don't remember posting about gravity. Certainly there are small spatial variations in gravity and small temporal changes in gravity. With regard to the rings, the Earth is primarily radially layered. There are somewhat predictable zones of amplification and de-amplification that are a function of distance from a seismic disturbance. However, beyond about 40 degrees, the amplitude of the seismic waves primarily simply diminishes with increasing distance. There are no secondary peaks that are large enough to trigger enough seismicity to easily see. The water in the oceans is too shallow to affect the seismic waves much, and the lateral variations like continental roots versus oceanic mantle are a second-order effect. So if seismicity shows up anomalously frequently at particular distances, one cannot resort the Earth structure to focus energy at those distances. John Follow Ups: ● Re: rings, gravity, etc. - Cathryn 21:54:57 - 9/30/2003 (19522) (1) ● oops - John Vidale 23:04:37 - 9/30/2003 (19523) (1) ● Re: oops - Cathryn 06:38:20 - 10/1/2003 (19530) (1) ● go Bruins! - John Vidale 07:01:55 - 10/1/2003 (19533) (1) ● Re: go Bruins! - Cathryn 00:49:00 - 10/2/2003 (19539) (2) ● retouched - John Vidale 08:58:06 - 10/2/2003 (19543) (0) ● Re: go Bruins! - Don in Hollister 01:54:06 - 10/2/2003 (19540) (1) ● Re: go Bruins! - Cathryn 17:10:54 - 10/2/2003 (19556) (1) ● Geeks on Parade! - Cathryn 17:31:46 - 10/2/2003 (19557) (1) ● web page contest - John Vidale 11:24:50 - 10/3/2003 (19567) (2) ● Re: web page contest - Cathryn 23:37:57 - 10/3/2003 (19587) (1) ● Re: web page contest - Cathryn 23:45:24 - 10/3/2003 (19589) (0) ● Re: web page contest - chris in suburbia 15:19:48 - 10/3/2003 (19576) (2) ● Chris, please post a link to ... - Cathryn 23:52:25 - 10/3/2003 (19590) (0) ● Re: web page contest - Cathryn 23:04:15 - 10/3/2003 (19584) (0) |
|