Researchers might feel that if only some destructive aftershock occurrence times can be identified like that then the procedure is not valuable. But they need to consider the fact that something like 6000 people reportedly lost their lives as a result of those two destructive aftershocks. And if that type of procedure can be just used to occasionally save 1000 or even only 100 lives then it has to be regarded as being valuable.

Facts: On May 26, 2003 there was a powerful and destructive earthquake in the Japan area. On May 14 I myself circulated a formal warning for one in that area.

Question: Will there be any destructive aftershocks for that earthquake?

Question: If so then when will they occur?

Possible Answer: Perhaps those wave charts would be helpful for determining that.

(2) As with the earthquake aftershocks, time lines drawn on the charts when certain types of earthquake precursors are detected will indicate when the probability is higher for the expected earthquake to occur. I myself was successful with using that procedure to determine that a powerful and destructive earthquake might occur around the middle of May.

(3) It presently appears to me that earthquakes are being triggered by combinations of forces and phenomena associated with the gravitational pulls of the sun and the moon and environmental factors such as a fault zone's north - south or east - west orientation. I believe that the wave chart technology should provide earthquake researchers with a powerful tool for investigating those relationships.

Where Things Stand