|
Okay EQF, You Have The Com |
Well EQF, it is quite apparent of late that other posters here are far more interested in your various claims about one thing or another than they are about correct predictions. So I'll let you take it from here. I've clearly demonstrated exact what a perfect prediction looks like and nobody's interested, so I won't fill up the bandwith with the frivolities of such endeavors. Nor am I going to waste my time pointing out your frailties. I'm withdrawing from the game. This tit for tat that has been going on here is totally a waste of anyone's time. You are standing stauchly in your method and will not bend or give, deliver a prediction here in front of everyone, yet you want to have accolades for your efforts. No problem...It's your thing....Not mine.. Petra Follow Ups: ● Re: Okay EQF, You Have The Com - Canie 22:59:33 - 5/21/2003 (18754) (1) ● Re: Okay EQF, You Have The Com - Don in Hollister 23:50:41 - 5/21/2003 (18757) (1) ● Re: Okay EQF, You Have The Com - Canie 06:44:54 - 5/22/2003 (18761) (1) ● Re: Okay EQF, You Have The Com - Petra Challus 07:13:51 - 5/22/2003 (18764) (2) ● Re: Okay EQF, You Have The Com - Canie 22:52:23 - 5/22/2003 (18775) (0) ● logical next step - John Vidale 08:51:18 - 5/22/2003 (18766) (1) ● Re: logical next step - Um Logic? - Petra Challus 18:36:49 - 5/22/2003 (18772) (1) ● that was a good call! - John Vidale 21:33:01 - 5/22/2003 (18774) (0) ● good cop/bad cop - John Vidale 21:16:45 - 5/21/2003 (18749) (0) |
|