Hi Canie,

I find this scenario confusing at best. For quite some time now our fellow board member has shared with us his new programs and explained his methods, but somehow he didn't feel comfortable in posting his prediction here. This is kind of unfortunate, because it would have been a good demonstration of what he has worked so hard to achieve.

The other problem which surfaces is one that has been around through countless predictors and that is how predictions are delivered. It happened with VAN and brought on a major controversy. So we don't want to see that happen to EQF either.

I feel rather sad that he doesn't feel confident enough to post a prediction here, yet he does feel confident in sharing his research efforts. I hope he will take your advice and post his predictions in the future.

I think in consideration of the people here in America who have family and friends in Japan and the Japanese are very earthquake prepared, it would have been nice to have posted the prediction here and those who have associates in Japan could have sent them an e-mail for a little heads up. No harm would have been done, but a window of opportunity could have presented itself.

I like to think of it in these terms. If I saw a shark in the bay, I would not just send my friends an e-mail and tell them to stay out of the bay, I would have found a way to tell as many as possible by any means available.

Life is to short and for some in earthquake prone area's even shorter. Let us share the gifts we have and send a message from the heart that says we care.

God Bless You Canie, you are a good woman.

Petra