can you be more specific?
Posted by John Vidale on May 12, 2003 at 08:49:41:

EQF

Some useful numbers would be:
What is the time interval? (A few days is vague.)
What is the magnitude range? (significant?)
Everywhere in the world but the Americas?
(That's your best localization?)

You should state, although I doubt you will, what you think are the chances of this earthquake, and state what the chances would be at ordinary times.

You're quite a ways from being able to test your ideas. Ideally, you should test your projections for long enough to show what's really happening, then present the results to us.

But I guess this is the latest post arguing that you know what matters in triggering earthquakes, but are incapable of testing it, but must tell us all about it anyway.

John


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: can you be more specific? - EQF  11:36:51 - 5/12/2003  (18674)  (1)
        ● Considering They Are Free - Don in Hollister  12:01:24 - 5/12/2003  (18676)  (1)
           ● Re: Considering They Are Free - EQF  12:42:37 - 5/12/2003  (18677)  (0)