|
can you be more specific? |
EQF Some useful numbers would be: You should state, although I doubt you will, what you think are the chances of this earthquake, and state what the chances would be at ordinary times. You're quite a ways from being able to test your ideas. Ideally, you should test your projections for long enough to show what's really happening, then present the results to us. But I guess this is the latest post arguing that you know what matters in triggering earthquakes, but are incapable of testing it, but must tell us all about it anyway. John Follow Ups: ● Re: can you be more specific? - EQF 11:36:51 - 5/12/2003 (18674) (1) ● Considering They Are Free - Don in Hollister 12:01:24 - 5/12/2003 (18676) (1) ● Re: Considering They Are Free - EQF 12:42:37 - 5/12/2003 (18677) (0) |
|