Posted by EQF on May 05, 2003 at 12:03:59:
In my previous note I stated that I was expecting between one and three earthquakes and that at least one of them would be significant enough to make it into the news. I also stated that it would probably match some of the number patterns I listed and that it could occur around the end of the first week in May. The following earthquake has now occurred: 2003/05/04 15:44:35 39.44N 77.09E 10.0 5.8 SOUTHERN XINJIANG, CHINA It reportedly destroyed some 1500 houses and claimed at least one life. It was a little earlier than expected but was significant, was in the news, and matched one of those number patterns. Here are the numbers I posted and those for the earthquake. Each number has the range of 1 to 90. 03/05/04 13 32 21 3 78 35 7 9 1 34 57 34 402774 16N 57W 24N 21W 22N 32W 22N 34W 2003/05/04 15:44:35 39N 77E 10 5.8 CHINA 03/05/01 B 36 37 4 81 37 7 9 1 36 34 -6 406509 15N 146E 11N 143E 12N 144E 12N 144E NEIS and/or RedPuma earthquake data Significant number matches would be 32 & 36, 3 & 4, 78 & 81, and 35 & 37. Numbers for other recent warning signals are also good matches for that earthquake. The following was the closest high probability location identified by my computer programs: 11Apr2002 20:19:46.2 40.0N 73.7E 3.5 KYRGYZSTAN A New Zealand earthquake also made it into the news. And it was a direct match for some recent warning signals and an indirect match for some of the other numbers in my first note. I am trying to decide if there might still be one or perhaps even two more significant earthquakes on the way. The goal here is to learn how to use those precursor signal numbers to determine exactly where an expected earthquake is going to occur. In this case the highest probability location which my computer programs identified was quite a ways to the east of there. And the closest high probability location in the New Zealand area was Fiji.
|