|
better |
E That's a better approach than your previous posts, fairly clear, although you should mention which web site and which magnitude scale up front. Hard to do statistics on a post-diction, since you chose the cut-off and longitude range after looking at the data. Did you calculate how unlikely it would be to see this pattern by chance, if it HAD been a prediction? How did the 7+ events come out? John John Follow Ups: ● Re: better - EQF 02:16:57 - 3/23/2003 (18323) (1) ● Re: better or worse - Petra Challus 05:37:05 - 3/23/2003 (18324) (0) |
|