Re: Chinese Earthquake Kills Hundreds
Posted by Kate on February 24, 2003 at 09:36:55:

Hi EQF. I hope that you are refining your techniques and implementing new and useful ways to evaluate the data you track. I have been down this path with you before, so I think it best not to return to past conversations.

I will simply state that the past couple of major earthquakes that involved fatalities were not predicted on this board by anyone that I am aware of. As far as useful predictions go, these poor people who died must not have gotten any warning from anyone including yourself. In order for a prediction to be useful in preventing fatalities it must include location, magnitude, and a relatively tight time window.

I certainly hope that you are closer today to coming up with these types of useful predictions. If you refine your methods, please post a prediction to this board PRIOR to the earthquake and explain to us how you did it. Take care...Kate


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Chinese Earthquake Kills Hundreds - EQF  13:14:55 - 2/24/2003  (18142)  (1)
        ● Re: Chinese Earthquake Kills Hundreds - Kate  13:49:31 - 2/24/2003  (18145)  (1)
           ● Re: Chinese Earthquake Kills Hundreds - Canie  22:58:57 - 2/24/2003  (18157)  (1)
              ● Re: Canie - Question - Petra Challus  06:10:42 - 2/25/2003  (18159)  (1)
                 ● Re: Canie - Question - Canie  07:49:52 - 2/25/2003  (18161)  (1)
                    ● Re: Canie - Question - Thanks, nt - Petra Challus  19:18:44 - 2/25/2003  (18164)  (1)
                       ● Re: Canie - Question - Thanks, nt - Canie  12:24:39 - 2/26/2003  (18171)  (0)