|
Re: Chinese Earthquake Kills Hundreds |
Hi EQF. I hope that you are refining your techniques and implementing new and useful ways to evaluate the data you track. I have been down this path with you before, so I think it best not to return to past conversations. I will simply state that the past couple of major earthquakes that involved fatalities were not predicted on this board by anyone that I am aware of. As far as useful predictions go, these poor people who died must not have gotten any warning from anyone including yourself. In order for a prediction to be useful in preventing fatalities it must include location, magnitude, and a relatively tight time window. I certainly hope that you are closer today to coming up with these types of useful predictions. If you refine your methods, please post a prediction to this board PRIOR to the earthquake and explain to us how you did it. Take care...Kate Follow Ups: ● Re: Chinese Earthquake Kills Hundreds - EQF 13:14:55 - 2/24/2003 (18142) (1) ● Re: Chinese Earthquake Kills Hundreds - Kate 13:49:31 - 2/24/2003 (18145) (1) ● Re: Chinese Earthquake Kills Hundreds - Canie 22:58:57 - 2/24/2003 (18157) (1) ● Re: Canie - Question - Petra Challus 06:10:42 - 2/25/2003 (18159) (1) ● Re: Canie - Question - Canie 07:49:52 - 2/25/2003 (18161) (1) ● Re: Canie - Question - Thanks, nt - Petra Challus 19:18:44 - 2/25/2003 (18164) (1) ● Re: Canie - Question - Thanks, nt - Canie 12:24:39 - 2/26/2003 (18171) (0) |
|