Dearest EQF,

I will not now or ever apologize for what was posted above. Do you understand? You owe me and two other ladies who have posted to this board an apology, long over-due. We have been demeaned frequently and I see you have done it again in saying that I am not of a scientific organization. But you say you are. Yet, you cannot prove it to us.

You cannot publically injure a person who is not known or recognized as a person. You may be an entity, but you are not a real person, in the most real sense. But I am a person and you have demeaned my persona. I don't appreciate it.

I asked you a question and you answered the question. According to Roberts Rules of Conduct, the issue was then set aside. But you are not satisified with those rules. Thus you have created a considerably stir over a moot issue. Why?

Perhaps we should take a poll of the board and ask the board members for comment on this issue, or a vote. We all share this space, so perhaps we should let the others have their say so on this matter.

Therefore may I say, Hear Ye, Hear Ye, Hear Ye, May the opinions of the posters of this board come now.

Vote as follows:

A. Forget about it.
B. Petra was wrong.
C. EQF is making to much of this.
D. EQF was wrong.
E. It's a horrible day, let's just move on and forget it.
F. Northern CA is in for a big one.
G. Southern CA is in for a big one.
H. To H..L with it.

The posters may answer by using the above lettering system in their responses. Without text.

Petra