Roger-sorry, slow to respond-proposal deadline for SCEC Tues PM. Am I correct that you give the 60 days before and then a gap and 60 days afterwards? And, that in years when there are 2 or more New Guinea quakes you have only given the number of SOCAL EQs for one of these?

Also, maybe all the quakes in 92 were Landers and or Joshua Tree, but I don't remember a big quake/aftershock sequence in 99-what is this?

It would be good if Lowell commented on this-we may not cover the same areas (did you include New Britain?), or that he removed aftershocks,and in certain years there are quakes within a few days of 30.

I consider it not fair game to go back in my records and see what Lowell might have provided me on this 15 years ago...It is possible that a cross correlation would show a statistical relation of significance, even if the effect is small?
Chris