|
|
|
|
| Re: The past is the key to the future |
Hey Lowell: Yes...I believe your subject heading. You have cited a very interesting example. Compelling as it may seem...it may still be a coincidence. What if the Alaska M7.9 had some influence in this quake ? Surface waves "greasing the fault" or something ...(as has been mentioned in past posts on this board). Anyway, there was a prediction out on usenet covering that general area (posted on 26 Oct). What about the current aftershock sequencing in AK being a harbinger of an incoming M8+ ? What does history say about that ? Seems like Don would have something to say about that as well...
Follow Ups: ● Re: The past is the key to the future - Lowell 07:34:22 - 11/9/2002 (17295) (2) ● Re: The past is the key to the future - 2cents 21:06:52 - 11/9/2002 (17306) (0) ● Alaska ground rupture, statistics - chris in suburbia 13:34:37 - 11/9/2002 (17297) (1) ● Re: Alaska ground rupture, statistics - Roger Hunter 15:10:55 - 11/9/2002 (17301) (1) ● more specific - chris in suburbia 19:03:20 - 11/9/2002 (17303) (1) ● Re: more specific - Lowell 23:41:53 - 11/9/2002 (17308) (1) ● Re: more specific - chris in suburbia 10:39:29 - 11/10/2002 (17312) (2) ● Re: more specific - Lowell 14:21:07 - 11/10/2002 (17314) (0) ● Re: more specific - Roger Hunter 12:16:04 - 11/10/2002 (17313) (1) ● Re: more specific - chris in suburbia 14:26:06 - 11/10/2002 (17315) (1) ● Re: more specific - Roger Hunter 16:32:20 - 11/10/2002 (17321) (0) |
|
|
|
|
