|
Re: More to quakes than physical stress |
Nice long term effort to help try and solve the problem insofar as prediction goes. I've a few questions: 1) Did you formalize your method (& put it in writing too)? 2)Did you publish anything on it ? 3) Did you use any statistical procedures to see if the method you were using was legit ? Otherwise you might have been chasing an illusion of sorts (thinking that you were seeing precursers instead of an early warning or cause and effect sequence...). I agree that lots of signals are being dismissed as noise...but this requires documentation to make one's case. Are you going to do this? A publication on this could trigger others (with the resources) to study things further.... Yes...the thinking 'outside the box' theme has been harped upon a bit before...glad we agree. Just my .02 worth Follow Ups: ● still in discovery phase - randall 11:41:21 - 9/29/2002 (16826) (0) |
|