Re: New ways to predict quakes (29 Nov. 2000)
Posted by Roger Hunter on June 11, 2002 at 17:24:17:

.02;

I didn't say they weren't big, I said they had different mechanisms.

Matter of fact, they should look something like the opposite of a nuclear explosion. A nuke shows up on all first arrivals. The rockburst should show down; it's an IMplosion.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: New ways to predict quakes (29 Nov. 2000) - 2cents  18:11:10 - 6/11/2002  (16013)  (1)
        ● Re: New ways to predict quakes (29 Nov. 2000) - Roger Hunter  18:24:02 - 6/11/2002  (16015)  (1)
           ● Re: New ways to predict quakes (29 Nov. 2000) - 2cents  18:32:41 - 6/11/2002  (16016)  (1)
              ● Re: New ways to predict quakes (29 Nov. 2000) - Roger Hunter  19:11:38 - 6/11/2002  (16019)  (1)
                 ● Re: New ways to predict quakes (29 Nov. 2000) - 2cents  21:07:42 - 6/11/2002  (16020)  (0)
     ● Re: New ways to predict quakes (29 Nov. 2000) - 2cents  18:10:50 - 6/11/2002  (16012)  (0)