Hi Don,

I am accepting (I think you mean it) my mistakes always, but at the same time I am
arguing with not acceptable ideas.

What I am doing is completely different way of prediction method and decoding and fix
a location is only from my experience and supported by very older data. At present
I have only little data and also very meagre infrastructure facility to register
the quake readings. Definitely I will fulfill your needs, if I provided with basic
requirements and make the method as systematic.

As I posted in this Board long back, for registering quakes there are numerous seismic
centers with ultra modern facilities are available with co-ordination of other centers
too but at the same time for predicting purpose people like us with different ideas are
working separately in different areas. Hence, we may not come to a conclusion at the
beginning of a new method though it is works well.

I am not accepting 100% appreciation for my prediction. But the quake occurred within
the prescribed period and at least by nearby place as predicted BUT WITH MY POOR SETUP.

SHAN
12.4.02