Re: limits needed for hits
Posted by Lowell on March 27, 2002 at 10:39:44:

OK, it won't count, but I would still like to see probabilities - could you relax
your limits and see what the probabilities would be if the quake was allowed.
The other thing is that right now PNSN is putting this quake at 126.00W, NEIS
at 126.7W etc. so there is (as always) considerable disagreement over where
the quake actually occurred.
Just for kicks lets see the probabilities.

Follow Ups:
     ● here ya go! - Roger Hunter  11:10:36 - 3/27/2002  (14243)  (1)
        ● Re: here ya go! - Lowell  11:12:56 - 3/27/2002  (14245)  (0)
     ● Re: limits needed for hits - Lowell  10:47:11 - 3/27/2002  (14237)  (2)
        ● Re: limits needed for hits - Roger Hunter  10:56:48 - 3/27/2002  (14241)  (1)
           ● Flinn-Engdahl Regions - Lowell  11:45:38 - 3/27/2002  (14254)  (0)
        ● Re: limits needed for hits - Canie  10:53:07 - 3/27/2002  (14240)  (0)