Re: March contest revised again
Posted by Lowell on March 26, 2002 at 11:02:03:

I looked over the latest output, Roger, and this time I can't find anything glaring
that is out of whack. Maybe you've got it to the point where it can be used.
But I do agree with EQF that documentation is definitely needed as, although
you have explained it's workings, they have evolved over time. Something that
is short either on this board or preferably on your web site where it is readily
obtainable would be great. Thanks for the efforts.

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: March contest revised again - Roger Hunter  11:59:11 - 3/26/2002  (14154)  (2)
        ● Re: March contest revised again - Canie  22:08:36 - 3/26/2002  (14191)  (1)
           ● Re: March contest revised again - Roger Hunter  04:55:50 - 3/27/2002  (14201)  (0)
        ● Re: March contest revised again - Lowell  12:16:16 - 3/26/2002  (14162)  (1)
           ● Re: March contest revised again - Roger Hunter  12:25:13 - 3/26/2002  (14165)  (1)
              ● Re: March contest revised again - Lowell  12:28:15 - 3/26/2002  (14166)  (1)
                 ● Re: March contest revised again - Roger Hunter  16:15:10 - 3/26/2002  (14177)  (1)
                    ● Re: March contest revised again - Lowell  19:13:46 - 3/26/2002  (14183)  (0)