|
Re: Regarding ear tone data |
This is a comment regarding ear tone data for people who might be interested in the scientific aspects of this subject matter. Some of the earthquake sensitives appear to have developed rather sophisticated warning experience evaluation procedures. I believe that there are people who can tell where an earthquake is likely to occur by noting if they feel some sensation in one or the other hand etc. The same might be true with ear tone data. Which ear the signal is heard in and how loud it is etc. could be important. Those types of evaluation procedures are at present too detailed for me. I am simply interested in the time when such signals are detected, not how loud or long they are or in which ear they are heard. There appear to be different approaches to evaluating these types of data. Some undoubtedly work better than others. And along those time lines, if you are submitting ear tone data to Canie's data page I will once again recommend that you add AM, PM, or UTC or GMT to your submitted time. That is my own recommendation. I am not representing Canie in making it. Follow Ups: ● Re: Regarding ear tone data - Nancy Hugo 21:46:36 - 2/15/2002 (13086) (2) ● Re: Regarding ear tone data - Mary Maya 02:53:22 - 2/16/2002 (13090) (1) ● Re: Regarding ear tone data - EQF 09:00:03 - 2/16/2002 (13093) (1) ● Re: Regarding ear tone data - Cathryn 19:29:16 - 2/16/2002 (13099) (0) ● Re: Regarding ear tone data - EQF 00:25:13 - 2/16/2002 (13088) (0) |
|