I have said much of the following repeatedly, and will probably do that again many times in the future:

There is a tremendous amount of information already out there regarding earthquake sensitivity. It is simply impossible to discuss it all here. I am gradually doing things such as getting that Freewebz site running which should help make those types of data easier to locate. But each step like that takes time. As I have said, it would be nice if we had a formal research group to help with this.

For several examples, I myself published a technical paper on earthquake sensitivity back in 1996. I believe that the person who is probably the best known of the earthquake sensitives worked with two geology specialists in publishing another paper. The two scientists would look at different electromagnetic energy field type precursors and she would try to tell them which ones were earthquake related. I am afraid I do not know who those scientists were. Their paper was probably published several years ago. I did not see it myself.

Ear tone data that I work with look like they are around 7000 cycles per second. Some people probably detect higher frequency signals. Some detect very low frequency ones. And there are some interesting stories about those low frequency signals which I would only discuss with people by e-mail. The subject matter can be a little touchy.

Those 6 hour or so alternating ear type ear tones are probably quite rare for any one person. However, if you were to look at ear tone data from a group of perhaps 10 people I believe that you would begin seeing one person detect a left ear tone signal for example. And at the right time another person would detect one in the right ear.

Finally, I really do have an earthquake sensitivity based forecasting program running which is I feel highly selective for earthquakes which will occur close enough to populated areas to cause problems. At that Freewebz site you are seeing the types of data that I actually use to warn governments and disaster mitigation group personnel around the world about approaching earthquakes.

The only other forecasting program outside of the People's Republic of China which appears to me to be working is run by United Nations personnel (other promising looking programs appear to me to still be highly experimental). And like U.N. personnel I believe, I am of the opinion that when you have limited resources of time etc. to work with you can spend all of it arguing with people and accomplish absolutely nothing. Or you can spend the time trying to improve the success rate of your program. You cannot do both.

These are my own opinions.