|
Re: False Positives |
Well you can difer if ya want, but up until now the accepted rule for False Positive was considered a miss...I know it sounds strange..but it was something Dennis, I and Dens friend made up...Perhaps it was wrong...and I think you for the clarification if so...but considering we are in a very deep water without wings....we have to fake it as we go...ya know? And as a scientist, you certainly must know the defination for a false positive....Waiting.. Follow Ups: ● Re: False Positives - Roger Hunter 17:39:01 - 12/7/2001 (11730) (0) |
|