Re: So CA EQ Watch Advisory
Posted by Lowell on December 03, 2001 at 01:53:11:

With Max in charge, I am sure you are correct in regards to WAPMER. Don't expect
anything but the same old earthquake quiescence theories from that source. Hard to
teach an old dog new tricks, they say, however coyotes, like Zima are a different story.
Can a leopard change it's spots - maybe with a little pain and hydrocloric acid.
Seems to me that this board is in the best position to have a registry of ear tones -
that is, after all, one of the original reasons for the board - as a sounding place
for earthquake sensitives. There are plenty of good, respected sensitives, amateurs
and scientists who post and read this board that appropriation for personal gain
is probably not possible if tones are registered here.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Tone Registry - Lowell & Canie - Petra Challus  07:18:58 - 12/3/2001  (11496)  (1)
        ● Re: Tone Registry - Lowell & Canie - Canie  09:38:23 - 12/3/2001  (11502)  (2)
           ● Lots of ideas and notions - bobshannon.org  15:24:54 - 12/3/2001  (11513)  (3)
              ● Re: Lots of ideas and notions - Canie  18:33:54 - 12/3/2001  (11528)  (0)
              ● Re: Marvelously Beautiful - Petra Challus  18:01:01 - 12/3/2001  (11525)  (0)
              ● Re: Lots of ideas and notions - Lowell  17:21:12 - 12/3/2001  (11519)  (0)
           ● Re: Tone Registry - Canie - Petra Challus  12:20:03 - 12/3/2001  (11505)  (0)