Misunderstood my intentions
Posted by Lowell on November 11, 2001 at 14:18:41:

Petra,
I have no opinion one way or the other on ear tones being related to earthquake or
not. As a scientist I am curious about the coincidence, but need some statistics
to back up claims on the matter. As you should know from our conversations in the past,
I believe there could be physical reasons why people such as yourself hear ear
tones before earthquakes. I would encourage you to continue keeping a log of
your tones and post whenever you feel appropriate. That is the only way to get the
necessary statistics to examine the relationship between ear tones and subsequent
earthquakes. If you do not do this, then the three years you have spent pursuing
this matter will have been for nought. I don't think you or anyone on this board would
want to see that happen. This is, after all, a board set up for sensitives. I am something
of an interloper here, although I also have my share of ear tones. But, the last thing
I want to do is to throw water on legitimate data - and the monitoring of ear tones
certainly is classified in that category.
Don't stop now, you and Don are getting close - I think it will take sensitives and
scientists working together to figure this out.


Follow Ups:
     ● Ear tones - EQF  15:05:40 - 11/11/2001  (10840)  (2)
        ● Re: Ear tones - 2cents  23:29:41 - 11/12/2001  (10879)  (1)
           ● Re: Ear tones - EQF  01:57:14 - 11/13/2001  (10883)  (0)
        ● Re: Ear tones - Cathryn  19:12:28 - 11/11/2001  (10844)  (1)
           ● Re: Ear tones - Petra Challus  19:40:24 - 11/11/2001  (10848)  (1)
              ● Re: Ear tones - Lowell  23:58:04 - 11/11/2001  (10854)  (1)
                 ● Same here (NT) - Cathryn  10:30:17 - 11/12/2001  (10865)  (0)