|
|
|
Misunderstood my intentions
|
Posted by Lowell on November 11, 2001 at 14:18:41:
Petra, I have no opinion one way or the other on ear tones being related to earthquake or not. As a scientist I am curious about the coincidence, but need some statistics to back up claims on the matter. As you should know from our conversations in the past, I believe there could be physical reasons why people such as yourself hear ear tones before earthquakes. I would encourage you to continue keeping a log of your tones and post whenever you feel appropriate. That is the only way to get the necessary statistics to examine the relationship between ear tones and subsequent earthquakes. If you do not do this, then the three years you have spent pursuing this matter will have been for nought. I don't think you or anyone on this board would want to see that happen. This is, after all, a board set up for sensitives. I am something of an interloper here, although I also have my share of ear tones. But, the last thing I want to do is to throw water on legitimate data - and the monitoring of ear tones certainly is classified in that category. Don't stop now, you and Don are getting close - I think it will take sensitives and scientists working together to figure this out.
Follow Ups:
● Ear tones - EQF 15:05:40 - 11/11/2001 (10840) (2)
● Re: Ear tones - 2cents 23:29:41 - 11/12/2001 (10879) (1)
● Re: Ear tones - EQF 01:57:14 - 11/13/2001 (10883) (0)
● Re: Ear tones - Cathryn 19:12:28 - 11/11/2001 (10844) (1)
● Re: Ear tones - Petra Challus 19:40:24 - 11/11/2001 (10848) (1)
● Re: Ear tones - Lowell 23:58:04 - 11/11/2001 (10854) (1)
● Same here (NT) - Cathryn 10:30:17 - 11/12/2001 (10865) (0)
|
|
|