|
Re: Extremely powerful CME and Kp 9 sudden commencement Geomagnetic storm on seismograms |
Nice report & some Q's: And how are signal interferences determined (i.e. confirm actual ground motion versus "ghost" noise signals showing) ? (I think this was brought up before). & What's significance of first up/down motion. From msg awhile back...shouldn't they all be first down motions....? & what's the story line on the timing of the event on the sun versus the earth...i.e. how is the "no delay" explained ?
Follow Ups: ● Re: Extremely powerful CME and Kp 9 sudden commencement Geomagnetic storm on seismograms - Lowell 01:36:07 - 11/6/2001 (10738) (1) ● Re: Extremely powerful CME and Kp 9 sudden commencement Geomagnetic storm on seismograms - 2cents 23:01:47 - 11/6/2001 (10754) (2) ● Re: Extremely powerful CME and Kp 9 sudden commencement Geomagnetic storm on seismograms - Roger Hunter 05:48:53 - 11/7/2001 (10758) (1) ● Thx Roger Re: Extremely powerful CME and Kp 9 sudden commencement Geomagnetic storm on seismograms - 2cents 08:17:26 - 11/7/2001 (10759) (1) ● Re: Thx Roger Re: Extremely powerful CME and Kp 9 sudden commencement Geomagnetic storm on seismograms - Roger Hunter 09:50:22 - 11/7/2001 (10763) (0) ● Re: Extremely powerful CME and Kp 9 sudden commencement Geomagnetic storm on seismograms - Lowell 23:55:32 - 11/6/2001 (10757) (1) ● Re: Extremely powerful CME and Kp 9 sudden commencement Geomagnetic storm on seismograms - 2cents 08:24:09 - 11/7/2001 (10760) (1) ● Re: Extremely powerful CME and Kp 9 sudden commencement Geomagnetic storm on seismograms - Roger Hunter 09:54:17 - 11/7/2001 (10764) (0) |
|