|
Re: 7.8 Scotia Sea foreshocks and focal mechanism |
Something I will add is that it is highly fortunate that those earthquakes occurred where they did. They were all apparently fairly shallow (10 km). And had they occurred anywhere near populated areas we would still be digging bodies out of the rubble of collapsed cities.
The computer programs could be easily developed. But it would require the use of one of those extremely fast and powerful government computers. This is because the programs would have to do optimization calculations for every fault zone in the world. And there are a lot of fault zones and a lot of past earthquakes to process.
And if you think that I have spent a lot of time saying unkind things about the geology specialists over the years then you should hear what I have said during the past few years to elected U.S. officials, Social Security personnel, and private insurance company personnel regarding the U.S. Government’s Social Security and Medicare Web site programs. The insurance people have all said that my recommendations for improvements are great. But the government officials that I have personally met with and talked with have all just stood there, smiled, and shook their heads. It has literally been like talking to trees. In any case, one of my top priority projects at this time is getting the U.S. to create a special new department that would help reduce the number of disasters that occur on a regular basis such as that current Medicare mess, the blown oil well in the Gulf of Mexico, and the Japan nuclear power plant meltdown. These are personal opinions. Follow Ups: ● Re: 7.8 Scotia Sea foreshocks and focal mechanism - Roger Hunter 08:18:17 - 11/22/2013 (101399) (0) ● Re: 7.8 Scotia Sea foreshocks and focal mechanism - Roger Hunter 08:17:10 - 11/22/2013 (101398) (1) ● Excuse the double post - Roger Hunter 09:02:15 - 11/22/2013 (101400) (1) ● Re: Excuse the double post - Skywise 15:51:56 - 11/22/2013 (101401) (0) |
|