|
Re: Philippines Earthquake – October 16, 2013 |
EQF; All of which proves exactly nothing. I know of one person who predicted a quake within a few minutes. Once. She could never do it again. Yes, you got one right, in fact you have made several correct forecasts but it's just chance at work. I know of several scientists who have tried to predict quakes with disastrous results. That's why few want to try it. Especially in the government, with grant money being scarce. No one wants to risk funds on wild goose chases. Things are settling down at home so I'm available again. I've been trying to prove to Amit that his hits are due to chance but he's as hard to convince as you are. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: Philippines Earthquake – October 16, 2013 - Skywise 00:51:46 - 10/19/2013 (101084) (1) ● Re: Philippines Earthquake – October 16, 2013 - Roger Hunter 08:53:13 - 10/19/2013 (101085) (1) ● Re: Philippines Earthquake – October 16, 2013 - Skywise 15:19:20 - 10/19/2013 (101086) (1) ● Re: Philippines Earthquake – October 16, 2013 - Roger Hunter 17:41:59 - 10/19/2013 (101087) (1) ● Re: Philippines Earthquake – October 16, 2013 - Skywise 03:21:14 - 10/20/2013 (101088) (1) ● scratch that... - Skywise 03:23:14 - 10/20/2013 (101089) (1) ● maybe... ??? - Skywise 05:16:57 - 10/20/2013 (101090) (1) ● speed!!!! - Skywise 05:32:10 - 10/20/2013 (101091) (1) ● Re: speed!!!! - Roger Hunter 09:59:37 - 10/20/2013 (101092) (2) ● Re: speed!!!! - Skywise 20:18:04 - 10/20/2013 (101097) (0) ● Re: speed!!!! - Roger Hunter 12:08:37 - 10/20/2013 (101093) (1) ● Re: speed!!!! - Amit 12:22:55 - 10/20/2013 (101094) (1) ● Re: speed!!!! - Roger Hunter 13:45:21 - 10/20/2013 (101095) (0) |
|