|
evaluation method |
Brian; Now that you're up to speed on how I do it, can you (or anyone) think of a better way? The math took two PhDs to come up with it, Dr Jones and his brother, but I'm open to suggestions. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: evaluation method - Skywise 19:52:56 - 10/11/2013 (101049) (2) ● Re: evaluation method comparison - Roger Hunter 12:04:23 - 10/15/2013 (101070) (0) ● Re: evaluation method - Roger Hunter 21:03:51 - 10/12/2013 (101053) (1) ● Re: evaluation method - Skywise 22:08:43 - 10/12/2013 (101054) (1) ● Re: evaluation method - Roger Hunter 09:27:58 - 10/13/2013 (101055) (1) ● Re: evaluation method - Skywise 16:37:52 - 10/13/2013 (101057) (1) ● Re: evaluation method - Roger Hunter 21:42:28 - 10/13/2013 (101058) (1) ● Re: evaluation method - Skywise 22:41:47 - 10/13/2013 (101059) (1) ● Re: evaluation method - Roger Hunter 23:44:16 - 10/13/2013 (101060) (1) ● Re: evaluation method - Skywise 00:54:33 - 10/14/2013 (101061) (1) ● Re: evaluation method - Roger Hunter 09:47:03 - 10/14/2013 (101063) (1) ● Re: evaluation method - Skywise 17:25:35 - 10/14/2013 (101065) (1) ● Re: evaluation method - Roger Hunter 22:14:10 - 10/14/2013 (101068) (0) ● Re: evaluation method - Roger Hunter 18:53:37 - 10/11/2013 (101048) (1) ● Re: evaluation method - Skywise 19:56:44 - 10/11/2013 (101050) (1) ● Re: evaluation method - Roger Hunter 20:04:01 - 10/11/2013 (101051) (0) |
|