|
Re: Energy Islands – May 1, 2013 |
The concept of aluminum as a fuel is new to me, so can't really comment on that one with any certainty, but hydrogen is a joke. The energy density of liquid hydrogen is only 8.5 MJ/L (megajoules per liter). Compare to gasoline at 34.2 MJ/L. There's actually more hydrogen in gasoline than there is in LH2, per volume. Although aluminum is 83.8 MJ/L, it's weight becomes an issue, as 'light' as it is. But, I'm concerned that an 'aluminum energy cycle' can't become viable unless it is introduced on a massive scale from the get go. I suspect the fixed energy costs to initiate the process are too high and would far offset the benefit, resulting in a net loss. The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics can be a real beach, eh? Brian Follow Ups: ● Aluminum - Skywise 01:07:42 - 5/5/2013 (100569) (1) ● Re: Aluminum - Roger Hunter 12:26:03 - 5/5/2013 (100572) (2) ● Re: Aluminum - EQF 02:49:13 - 5/7/2013 (100575) (1) ● Re: Aluminum - Roger Hunter 08:35:13 - 5/7/2013 (100576) (1) ● Re: Aluminum - EQF 07:53:36 - 5/8/2013 (100577) (1) ● Re: Aluminum - Skywise 16:15:36 - 5/8/2013 (100579) (1) ● Proposed Foundation - May 11, 2013 - EQF 01:31:14 - 5/11/2013 (100583) (0) ● Re: Aluminum - Skywise 01:30:59 - 5/6/2013 (100573) (0) |
|